diff --git a/upstream/VoltAgent-awesome-ai-agent-papers/catalogue/README.md b/upstream/VoltAgent-awesome-ai-agent-papers/catalogue/README.md index 0c704ec..0c584ca 100644 --- a/upstream/VoltAgent-awesome-ai-agent-papers/catalogue/README.md +++ b/upstream/VoltAgent-awesome-ai-agent-papers/catalogue/README.md @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ title: "Awesome AI Agent Papers" task: "" lineage_type: import -upstream_source: https://github.com/VoltAgent/awesome-ai-agent-papers/blob/d467d641/README.md -upstream_sha: d467d641 -imported_at: 2026-06-26 +upstream_source: https://github.com/VoltAgent/awesome-ai-agent-papers/blob/aa50c0c3/README.md +upstream_sha: aa50c0c3 +imported_at: 2026-07-03 prompt_class: catalogue upstream_changes: accepted author: upstream @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ Hundreds of papers are published on arXiv every week, and a growing number of th | Paper | arXiv ID | |---|:---:| +| **[PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluation](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.05697)** - A persona-conditioned framework that predicts how a specific user would answer UI/UX evaluation questions and explains why in natural language. Trained via contrastive reflection fine-tuning and reflective prompt evolution, reaching human-level realism and generalizing to unseen questions and personas. | arXiv | | **[AutoNumerics: An Autonomous, PDE-Agnostic Multi-Agent Pipeline for Scientific Computing](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17607)** - A multi-agent pipeline that reads a PDE problem description in plain text and writes, debugs, and validates a classical numerical solver end-to-end. Generates spectral and finite-difference code (no neural networks), scoring ~6 orders of magnitude below FNO and CodePDE baselines. | arXiv | | **[Beyond Offline A/B Testing: Context-Aware Agent Simulation for Recommender System Evaluation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09549)** - Evaluates recommender systems via agent-RS interactions. | arXiv | | **[CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.01658)** - Introduces long-running multi-agent systems that self-evolve via shared persistent memory, asynchronous execution, and heartbeat-based interventions; 3–10× higher improvement rates than fixed evolutionary-search baselines on 10 math/algorithmic/systems tasks. | arXiv | @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ Hundreds of papers are published on arXiv every week, and a growing number of th | Paper | arXiv ID | |---|:---:| +| **[PerspectiveGap: A Benchmark for Multi-Agent Orchestration Prompting](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.08878)** - A 110-scenario benchmark testing whether LLMs can compose orchestration prompts that distribute context to sub-agents without information leakage. Across 10 topologies and 27 commercial models, GPT-5.5 leads with 62% pass rate while the average is 14.9%. | arXiv | | **[ClawBench: Evaluating Browser Agents on Live Production Websites with Submission-Interception](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08523)** - Benchmarks browser agents on 283 everyday tasks (V1 153 + V2 130) across 163 live production sites, with a Chrome-extension plus CDP layer that blocks only the final write request so agents can run end-to-end on real sites without real-world side effects. Two-stage scoring (interception + LLM judge); leaderboard at https://claw-bench.com. | arXiv | | **[From Features to Actions: Explainability in Traditional and Agentic AI Systems](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.06841v1)** - Compares attribution-based explanations with trace-based diagnostics across static and agentic settings to study how explainability methods translate to multi-step agent trajectories. | arXiv | | **[Agentic Uncertainty Reveals Agentic Overconfidence](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.06948v1)** - Investigates whether agents can accurately predict their own success rates in agentic tasks. | arXiv | @@ -297,12 +299,13 @@ Hundreds of papers are published on arXiv every week, and a growing number of th
-

Agent Tooling (95)

+

Agent Tooling (96)


| Paper | arXiv ID | |---|:---:| +| **[On Effectiveness and Efficiency of Agentic Tool-calling and RL Training](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.00135)** - Find that current agentic tool-calling benchmarks like BFCL are quite brittle: system prompt, multi-turn template or even pure random seeds could have huge influence on the final performance. | arXiv | | **[TraceCoder: A Trace-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Debugging](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.06875v1)** - Proposes a multi-agent observe-analyze-repair loop that uses runtime traces to find and fix bugs in LLM-generated code. | arXiv | | **[Generative Ontology: When Structured Knowledge Learns to Create](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.05636v1)** - Explores constraining LLM generation with executable schemas and multi-agent roles to produce structurally valid yet creative outputs. | arXiv | | **[Structured Context Engineering for File-Native Agentic Systems](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.05447v1)** - Tests how context format (YAML, JSON, Markdown) affects agent accuracy across 9,649 experiments in file-native agentic systems. | arXiv |