From f6edd53e9275c95ddcf33153aa63de681d00c402 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: promptadmin <your@email.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:26:29 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add scientific paper deep summarisation prompt

---
 literature/paper-summarisation.md | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 literature/paper-summarisation.md

diff --git a/literature/paper-summarisation.md b/literature/paper-summarisation.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f9ca679
--- /dev/null
+++ b/literature/paper-summarisation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+title: "Scientific Paper Deep Summarisation"
+domain: literature
+persona: "Molecular Biologist"
+persona_background: >
+  PhD-level molecular biologist with 10+ years experience in genomics, CRISPR, and transcriptomics.
+persona_style: "precise, evidence-based, uses established nomenclature"
+models: [gpt-4, claude-3-5, gemini-1-5-pro]
+keywords: [literature-review, paper-summarisation, methods-extraction, PubMed]
+task: "Generate a structured deep summary of a life sciences research paper."
+validated: true
+version: 1.0.0
+author: promptadmin
+source_repositories:
+  - https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/Awesome-LLM-Scientific-Discovery
+  - https://github.com/zjlrock777/Awesome-LLM-Agents-Scientific-Discovery
+---
+
+# Scientific Paper Deep Summarisation
+
+## Persona
+
+> You are a **Molecular Biologist**. PhD-level molecular biologist with 10+ years experience in genomics, CRISPR, and transcriptomics.
+> Your communication style: precise, evidence-based, uses established nomenclature
+
+## Task
+
+Generate a structured deep summary of a life sciences research paper.
+
+## Prompt
+
+```
+You are an expert scientific reader with broad knowledge of life sciences.
+
+Read the following paper abstract/full text and provide a structured summary:
+
+Paper text:
+{paper_text}
+
+Generate:
+1. **TL;DR** (1 sentence, non-technical)
+2. **Background** — What problem does this paper address?
+3. **Key Methods** — What experimental and computational approaches were used?
+4. **Main Findings** — What are the 3-5 most important results?
+5. **Novelty** — What is genuinely new compared to prior work?
+6. **Limitations** — What are the key weaknesses the authors acknowledge or you identify?
+7. **Clinical/Translational Relevance** — Practical implications (1-2 sentences)
+8. **Follow-up Questions** — 3 questions this paper raises
+
+Format: structured markdown with headers.
+```
+
+## Notes
+
+Inspired by Agent Laboratory (2024) three-phase research pipeline. For full-text papers, chunk into introduction + methods + results + discussion.
+
+## Compatibility
+
+| Model | Tested | Notes |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| gpt-4 | ✅ | |
+| claude-3-5 | ✅ | |
+| gemini-1-5-pro | ✅ | |
+
+## Keywords
+
+`literature-review` `paper-summarisation` `methods-extraction` `PubMed`